Graduate student's sexual harassment complaint against tenured professor succeeded on breach of contract grounds when university failed to follow removal procedures outlined in employment contract.
Excerpt
Universities and colleges—Civil rights—Graduate student's formal complaint of sexual harassment against tenured professor—Employment contract provides procedures \for dismissal or removal from tenure\—Removal procedures not followed and contract breached, when.
What This Ruling Means
# Chan v. Miami University: What This Case Means
## What Happened
A graduate student at Miami University filed a formal complaint of sexual harassment against a tenured professor. The student expected the university to investigate and take action according to the procedures outlined in the professor's employment contract.
## What the Court Decided
The court ruled in the graduate student's favor on a breach of contract claim. The university had failed to follow the dismissal and removal procedures that were spelled out in the professor's employment contract. By skipping these required steps, the university violated its own contractual obligations.
## Why This Matters for Workers
This case shows that employers must follow their own established procedures when handling serious complaints like harassment. Even when addressing tenured employees or high-ranking staff, universities cannot skip steps outlined in contracts. Workers can hold employers accountable not just for how they investigate complaints, but for whether they actually follow the rules they've set. This reinforces that contracts and official policies matter and must be honored.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.