No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The court granted in part and denied in part both parties' motions for summary judgment in this ERISA long-term disability benefits dispute. The court found Unum's termination of Black's benefits was arbitrary and capricious because Unum failed to properly account for his sedentary functional capacity when evaluating his ability to work in any gainful occupation.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.