The Illinois Appellate Court reversed the Illinois Labor Relations Board's decision, finding that CMS's unilateral cessation of step increases after the CBA expired failed to maintain the status quo and constituted an unfair labor practice.
What This Ruling Means
# AFSCME v. Illinois Labor Relations Board (2017)
**What Happened**
A union representing state workers in Illinois accused the state's Department of Central Management Services of illegal retaliation during contract negotiations. Specifically, the state stopped making step increase payments—regular pay raises tied to employee seniority—without asking the union's permission. The union filed a complaint, but the state's labor board initially dismissed it.
**What the Court Decided**
An appeals court disagreed with the dismissal and sided with the union. The court ruled that the state violated labor law by unilaterally changing pay terms during ongoing contract talks. Employers cannot make significant changes to wages or benefits without negotiating with the union first.
**Why This Matters for Workers**
This ruling protects unionized employees from employers using financial pressure during negotiations. It establishes that companies must keep things as they are—maintain the status quo—while talking with unions about new contracts. Workers can challenge sudden changes to pay or benefits that happen during negotiations, even if their union didn't immediately object.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.