The jury found in favor of the EEOC, and the Seventh Circuit affirmed that a reasonable jury could conclude the employee experienced a hostile work environment due to customer stalking. However, the court remanded regarding backpay eligibility for the unpaid medical leave period.
What This Ruling Means
**EEOC v. Costco: Court Rules Employer Must Address Customer Harassment**
This case involved a Costco employee who was being stalked and harassed by a customer while at work. The employee claimed that Costco failed to adequately protect her from this customer's behavior, creating a hostile work environment that violated federal employment laws.
The court ruled in favor of the employee and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). A jury found that Costco had indeed allowed a hostile work environment to exist by not taking sufficient action to stop the customer harassment. The appeals court agreed that a reasonable jury could reach this conclusion based on the evidence. However, the court sent part of the case back to the lower court to determine whether the employee should receive back pay for time she took off work for medical reasons related to the harassment.
This ruling is important for workers because it confirms that employers have a legal duty to protect employees from harassment by customers, not just by coworkers or supervisors. If your employer knows about customer harassment and fails to take reasonable steps to stop it, they may be held legally responsible for creating a hostile work environment.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.