The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court reversed and vacated an arbitration award that had ordered the city to appoint a union member to the position of director of veterans' services, holding that G.L. c. 115, § 10 grants the mayor exclusive nondelegable authority to make the appointment, which is not a proper subject for collective bargaining or arbitration.
What This Ruling Means
**City of Somerville v. Somerville Municipal Employees Association**
This case was about who gets to decide how the city hires its director of veterans' services. The union representing city employees believed they had the right to challenge the mayor's hiring decision through their grievance process and arbitration. When the union filed a grievance about how the position was filled, an arbitrator initially ruled in their favor.
However, the Massachusetts Supreme Court overturned that decision in 2008. The court ruled that state law gives the mayor exclusive authority to appoint the veterans' services director, and this power cannot be shared with anyone else or challenged through union processes. The court said this appointment authority is so important that it cannot be limited by collective bargaining agreements or union grievance procedures.
**What this means for workers:** This ruling shows that certain management decisions are completely outside the reach of union contracts and grievance processes. Even when you have a strong union and collective bargaining agreement, some employer powers are protected by law and cannot be challenged through normal union channels. Workers should understand that not all workplace disputes can be resolved through their union's grievance process, especially when state law gives management exclusive authority over certain decisions.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.