No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The Court of Appeals affirmed that the challenged portions of 2011 PA 264 (requiring 4% contributions from DB plan members and changing overtime calculation) were unconstitutional under Const 1963, art 11, § 5 because they intruded on the Civil Service Commission's authority. However, it reversed the trial court's voiding of the entire act and remanded for severability analysis.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.