No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The court allowed plaintiffs' cross motion for partial summary judgment on the 'named insured' defense, holding that Boston Gas effectively succeeded to insurance policy rights of the gas subsidiaries despite no-assignment clauses, because the policies were triggered by property damage occurring before the asset transfer.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.