No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The trial court found in favor of the plaintiff on her claims for breach of contract and violation of Massachusetts consumer protection law (G.L.c. 93A), awarding $12,000 in damages plus interest, costs, and attorney's fees. The appellate court affirmed the judgment, finding the insurer's requirement that the plaintiff travel an unreasonable distance for an examination under oath was unfair and deceptive.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.