No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The court denied Union Pacific's motion to amend its answer to add a direct threat affirmative defense on the eve of trial, finding lack of diligence and good cause under Rule 16(b), but granted the motion regarding statutory damages caps which did not require amendment.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.