Raleigh Housing Authority
3 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2013–2021)
3 trusted published court opinions across 2 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Raleigh Housing Authority as an employer in 3 distinct federal employment cases between 2013 and 2021.
The most common claims on record were Wrongful Termination.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 2 distinct cases.
About this employer
Raleigh Housing Authority appears in 3 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Raleigh Hous. Auth. v. Winston (2021) — Plaintiff Win. This case involved a dispute between the Raleigh Housing Authority and a tenant named Winston over a lease termination notice. The Housing Authority tried to evict Winston from public housing, but Winston challenged the eviction notice, arguing it didn't properly explain why the lease was being terminated. Read the ruling.
Raleigh Hous. Auth. v. Winston (2021) — Plaintiff Win. This case involved a dispute between the Raleigh Housing Authority and a tenant named Winston over how the housing authority handled a lease termination notice. The central issue was whether the housing authority properly explained the specific reasons for ending Winston's public housing lease, as required by federal r… Read the ruling.
The published opinion involves a wrongful termination claim. Browse other wrongful termination rulings for comparable fact patterns and how courts have ruled. Wrongful Termination.
These published opinions sit within the public sector, where due-process protections, First Amendment retaliation, and union-related (NLRA / state PERB) claims apply.
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Government & Public Sector employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.