Jiggetts v. Janseen Pharmaceuticals
Case Details
- Nature of Suit
- 440 Civil Rights: Other
- Status
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture
- motion to dismiss
- State
- Maryland
- Circuit
- 4th Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Outcome
The court dismissed claims against several defendants (DOC, Long, Harlan, Crawford, McGuire) for failure to state a claim and immunity, but allowed individual-capacity claims against Warden Robey, Officer Cook, and Officer Heitzman to proceed based on alleged Eighth Amendment violations for placing plaintiff in suicide attire without justification.
Similar Rulings
Motion for judgment on the pleadings Civ.R. 12 Civ.R. 8 Civ.R. 10 pro se litigant false imprisonment confinement force threat of force breach of contract constitutional deprivation state actor discrimination. Appellant failed to plead actionable claims for false imprisonment, breach of contract, deprivation of constitutional rights, or discrimination. Accordingly, the trial court did not err in granting appellees' motion for judgment on the pleadings.
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.