Walter L. Bronhard v. Thayer Street District Management Authority
Case Details
- Status
- Published
- Procedural Posture
- summary judgment
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Excerpt
The plaintiff, Walter L. Bronhard d/b/a Walter L. Bronhard Real Estate, appealed from a Superior Court judgment entered in favor of the defendant, Thayer Street District Management Authority, following the grant of the defendant's motion for summary judgment. On appeal, the plaintiff argued that the hearing justice ignored the plain language of G.L. 1956 § 45-59-22(c), erred in determining that the statute is directory rather than mandatory, and, ultimately, incorrectly granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment as to all claims. The Supreme Court applied the factors set forth in West v. McDonald, 18 A.3d 526 (R.I. 2011), to the facts of the case and agreed with the hearing justice's determination that § 45 59 22(c) is directory. Accordingly, the Supreme Court held that the hearing justice did not err and affirmed the judgment of the Superior Court.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.