State Of Washington v. Joshua Adam Levinson
Wash. Ct. App.September 16, 2013No. 69035-3
Defendant WinJoshua Adam Levinson
Case Details
- Status
- Unpublished
- Procedural Posture
- appeal
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Outcome
The appellate court affirmed the trial court's denial of the defendant's motion to suppress evidence, finding that the defendant voluntarily consented to the police search of his motel room and that substantial evidence supported this finding.
What This Ruling Means
**What Happened**
This case involved Joshua Adam Levinson, who was charged by the State of Washington with a crime. Before his trial, Levinson asked the court to exclude certain evidence that police had gathered by searching his motel room. He argued that the search was illegal and violated his rights, so the evidence shouldn't be allowed in court.
**What the Court Decided**
The court ruled against Levinson. Both the original trial court and the appeals court found that Levinson had voluntarily agreed to let police search his motel room. Since he gave his consent, the search was legal, and the evidence could be used against him. The appeals court upheld the lower court's decision to allow the evidence.
**Why This Matters for Workers**
While this case doesn't directly involve workplace issues, it's important for workers to understand their rights during police encounters, especially if criminal charges could affect their employment. Workers should know they can refuse consent to searches in most situations. Any criminal conviction can impact job prospects, professional licenses, or current employment, so understanding these basic legal protections is valuable for protecting one's career and livelihood.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Michael Salvo, App. V. Washington Criminal Justice Training Commission, Et Ano, Resp.
Wash. Ct. App.May 2026
Rachel Gottschalk V. Washington State Employment Security Department
Wash. Ct. App.Nov 2025
Neydin Gaspar, on behalf of the Estate of Lenin Estrada Salgado v. The Last Resort Operations, LLC
Wash. Ct. App.Oct 2025
Loanita Adams, V. Nasro Ugas
Wash. Ct. App.Jan 2025
Madhusudhan Ananderi Kandadai, V. Snohomish County
Wash. Ct. App.Nov 2024
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.