Skip to main content

U.S. Acute Care Solutions, L.L.C. v. Doctors Co. Risk Retention Group Ins. Co.

OhioNovember 6, 2025No. 2024-0450

Case Details

Judge(s)
Hawkins, J.
Status
Published
Procedural Posture
Appeal to Ohio Supreme Court; Court of Appeals judgment reversed

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Court of Appeals judgment reversed. The Supreme Court of Ohio held that the presumption of arbitrability applies to a bad-faith insurance claim when an arbitration agreement contains broad language, requiring arbitration rather than court proceedings.

Excerpt

Civil law—Insurance—Arbitration agreements—The presumption of arbitrability applies to a bad-faith insurance-handling claim when the arbitration agreement contains a broad clause and the underlying civil action could not be maintained without referring to the insurance policy or the relationship between the insurer and the insured—Court of appeals' judgment reversed.

Similar Rulings

Basinger
OhioFeb 2026

Mandamus—Public-records requests—Relator failed to show that the only named respondent, a mail-room employee, had a clear legal duty to provide requested public records—Court of appeals improperly dismissed complaint after granting summary judgment to respondent—Court of appeals' judgment modified, and writ and request for statutory damages denied.

Mixed Result
State ex rel. Platt v. Montgomery Cty. Bd. of Elections
OhioFeb 2026

Attorney fees—$400 an hour determined to be reasonable rate given respondents' concession and the absence of satisfactory evidence submitted by relator in support of $690 rate billed by relator's attorneys—Respondents invoked "good-faith exception" too late because former R.C. 149.43(C)(3)(c) does not provide a basis for reducing an award of attorney fees but, rather, applies only to the court's initial determination of whether to award fees to a prevailing relator—Relator's attorney-fee application granted in amount of $28,120.

Plaintiff Win
In re Application of S. Branch Solar, L.L.C.
OhioDec 2025

Power Siting Board—R.C. 4906.10(A)—Solar-powered electric-generation facility—Application for certificate of environmental compatibility and public need—Board's determinations under R.C. 4906.10(A)(2), (3), and (6) were not unlawful or unreasonable—Board's order granting certificate affirmed.

Plaintiff Win
State ex rel. Papageorgiou v. Avalotis Corp.
OhioDec 2025

Workers' compensation—Industrial Commission did not abuse its discretion in denying claimant's request for temporary-total-disability compensation after finding that he had voluntarily abandoned his employment by not accepting employer's job offer of light-duty work following work-related injury—Court of appeals' judgment denying writ of mandamus affirmed.

Defendant Win
In re Application of Dempsey
OhioNov 2025

Attorneys—Character and fitness—Gov.Bar R. I(11)—Application for admission to practice of law in Ohio by transferred Uniform Bar Exam score—Gov.Bar R. I(13)(D)(3)—Abandonment of employment and clients, falsification of documents, general dishonesty, and lack of candor—Application disapproved but applicant permitted to reapply after July 1, 2026.

Dismissed

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.