Skip to main content

Brett Rosasco v. West Knoxville Painters, LLC

Tenn.November 18, 2021No. E2020-01656-SC-R3-WC

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge William B. Acree, Sr.
Status
Unknown
Procedural Posture
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Excerpt

Brett Rosasco ("Employee") was injured when he was struck by a falling tree after he tried to use a portable restroom near his worksite. The Court of Workers' Compensation Claims determined that Mr. Rosasco's injury did not "arise primarily out of and in the course and scope of [his] employment" and granted summary judgment for West Knoxville Painters, LLC ("Employer"). See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-102(14). Mr. Rosasco's appeal has been referred to this Panel for a hearing and a report of findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 51. After reviewing the evidence, we affirm the judgment.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened:** Brett Rosasco, an employee of West Knoxville Painters, was injured when a tree fell on him while he was trying to use a portable restroom near his work site. Rosasco filed a workers' compensation claim, arguing that his injury should be covered because it happened while he was at work. The painting company disagreed and fought the claim. **What the Court Decided:** The court ruled against Rosasco and sided with West Knoxville Painters. The judge determined that Rosasco's injury did not "arise primarily out of and in the course and scope of his employment" - meaning the injury wasn't directly related enough to his actual work duties to qualify for workers' compensation benefits. The court granted summary judgment for the employer, dismissing Rosasco's claim. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This case shows that not every injury that happens at or near a workplace automatically qualifies for workers' compensation. Courts look at whether the injury is directly connected to your job duties. If you're hurt while doing something personal or unrelated to work - even if you're on company property - you might not be covered. Workers should understand that workers' compensation has limits and isn't guaranteed for all workplace incidents.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Similar Rulings

Derinda Carr v. Windham Professionals, Inc.
Tenn.Apr 2022

Appellant Derinda Carr challenges the trial court's finding her neck injury did not arise primarily "out of and in the course and scope of' her employment. The appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel for a hearing and a report of findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 51. We agree with the trial court and affirm the judgment.

Defendant Win
Bethany Shelton v. Hobbs Enterprises, LLC
Tenn.Sep 2021

Bethany Shelton ("Employee") filed a petition for benefit determination against Hobbs Enterprises, LLC ("Employer") alleging an injury to her right shoulder suffered in a work- related accident on August 26, 2017. She sought temporary total, permanent partial, and continued medical benefits. Following the issuance of a dispute certification notice, Employer moved for summary judgment on the basis the only medical testimony, from the Employee's treating orthopedic surgeon, Dr. Sean Kaminsky, was insufficient as a matter of law to establish causation. The Court of Workers' Compensation Claims (the "trial court") denied the motion and denied Employer's motion to reconsider. Employer sought an expedited appeal before the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, but then sought and was granted a dismissal of that appeal. A trial was held, after which the trial court denied Employee's claim on the ground she had failed to meet her burden to establish her right shoulder injury arose primarily out of and in the course and scope of her employment with Employer. Employee filed a motion to reconsider, which the trial court denied. She appealed directly to the Supreme Court. The appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel for a hearing and a report of findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 51. We affirm the judgment of the Court of Workers' Compensation Claims.

Defendant Win

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.