Outcome
The Court of Appeals affirmed summary judgment in favor of the Department of Labor and Industries, holding that L&I properly calculated former inmate Hill's time-loss compensation wage basis under former RCW 51.08.178(1), rejecting his argument that his Class II inmate work program 'gratuity' pay was not 'wages' under the statute.
What This Ruling Means
**Hill v. Department of Labor and Industries: Court Rules on Prison Work Pay and Workers' Compensation**
This case involved a dispute over workers' compensation benefits for an inmate who was injured while working in prison. Hill, the inmate, was earning $0.85 per hour for his prison work when he got hurt on the job. When he filed for workers' compensation benefits, the Department of Labor and Industries calculated his payments based on those very low prison wages. Hill challenged this, arguing that the tiny hourly payment shouldn't count as real "wages" for determining his benefits.
The Washington Court of Appeals disagreed with Hill and sided with the state agency. The court ruled that even the $0.85 per hour payment qualified as "wages" under workers' compensation law, and that the Department properly used this amount to calculate Hill's time-loss benefits.
This decision matters for workers because it shows how courts interpret wage requirements in workers' compensation cases. While most workers earn much more than prison wages, the ruling demonstrates that even very small payments can be considered wages when calculating benefits. Workers should understand that their compensation benefits are typically tied directly to their actual earnings, regardless of how low those earnings might be.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.