No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Court of Appeals affirmed summary judgment for the state agencies, holding that Bennerstrom was not an employee of DSHS for workers' compensation purposes because he did not consent to an employment relationship and was a domestic servant excluded from coverage.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.