No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The Wyoming Supreme Court reversed the district court's judgment, holding that Union Pacific properly omitted child support garnishment when calculating disposable earnings for a consumer debt garnishment, as including it would violate the Consumer Protection Act's 25% maximum garnishment limit.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.