Alejandro Marquez v. Lorenza Moncada and the Office of the Attorney General of Texas
Tex. App.—1st Dist.July 12, 2012No. 01-11-00783-CV
Case Details
- Status
- Published
- Procedural Posture
- appeal
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Outcome
The appellate court reversed the trial court's child support order due to insufficient evidence of the father's net resources and remanded for recalculation, finding no documented evidence of income was presented at the hearing.
What This Ruling Means
**What Happened**
Alejandro Marquez, an employee, filed a lawsuit against his supervisor Lorenza Moncada and the Office of the Attorney General of Texas. The case involved an employment-related dispute, though the specific details of what went wrong at work are not available from the court records provided.
**What the Court Decided**
Unfortunately, the outcome of this case is not clear from the available information. The case was filed in a Texas appeals court in July 2012, but the final decision and reasoning are not included in the court records summary.
**Why This Matters for Workers**
While we cannot draw specific lessons from this case due to incomplete information, it does show that workers have the right to take legal action against both individual supervisors and government agencies when they believe their employment rights have been violated. Government employees, like those working for the Texas Attorney General's office, are not immune from employment law disputes. Workers should know they can pursue legal remedies when workplace issues arise, whether their employer is a private company or government agency.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Read Full OpinionMore Lorenza Moncada and the Office of the Attorney General of Texas RulingsAll Rulings
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.