LaDawn Shrieves King v. Dwayne E. King
VACTAPPNovember 24, 2015No. 2066144
Defendant WinDwayne E. King
Case Details
- Status
- Unpublished
- Procedural Posture
- appeal
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Outcome
The Court of Appeals of Virginia affirmed the trial court's decision granting husband a divorce based on cruelty, rejecting wife's three assignments of error regarding the admission of evidence and sufficiency of corroboration.
What This Ruling Means
**Case Summary: King v. King**
This case involved a divorce dispute between LaDawn Shrieves King and her husband Dwayne E. King. While labeled as an employment law case, the court records show this was actually a divorce proceeding where the husband sought to end the marriage based on claims of cruelty. The wife challenged the court's handling of evidence and argued there wasn't enough proof to support her husband's claims.
**What the Court Decided:**
The Virginia Court of Appeals sided with the husband and upheld the lower court's decision to grant the divorce. The court rejected the wife's three main objections about how evidence was handled during the trial and found that there was sufficient proof to support the husband's cruelty claims.
**Why This Matters for Workers:**
Despite being categorized as an employment law case, this appears to be a family law matter that doesn't directly impact workplace rights or employment protections. Workers looking for guidance on employment issues should focus on cases that specifically address workplace disputes, discrimination, wages, or other job-related matters rather than divorce proceedings.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
The Uninsured Employers' Fund v. Jose A. Zacarias Perez
VACTAPPFeb 2026
Agustin Perez v. Laboratory Corporation of America
VACTAPPDec 2025
John Doe v. Virginia Employment Commission, Aces Group LLC and Insperity Peo Services
VACTAPPJul 2022
Phillip Clay, Jr. v. Virginia Employment Commission
VACTAPPJun 2022
Magic City Ford Lincoln Isuzu Trucks and Vada Group Self-Insurance Association v. Larry Kerr
VACTAPPAug 2021
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.