Skip to main content

Jeremy David Parvin v. Jackie LaDean Newman

Tenn. Ct. App.December 9, 2016No. E2016-00549-COA-R3-CVCited 3 times
Defendant WinJackie LaDean Newman

Case Details

Judge(s)
Frierson, Stafford, Bennett
Status
Published
Procedural Posture
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the Wife, finding the Husband's abuse of process complaint was barred by res judicata. The appellate court affirmed, and subsequently imposed sanctions against Husband's counsel in the amount of $9,745.25 for attorney's fees and expenses.

What This Ruling Means

# Case Summary: Parvin v. Newman **What Happened** Jeremy David Parvin filed a lawsuit against Jackie LaDean Newman, claiming abuse of the legal process. The case involved an employment-related dispute that had apparently been addressed in previous court proceedings. **What the Court Decided** The trial court ruled against Parvin, finding that his complaint was barred because the same issue had already been decided in an earlier case. The appeals court agreed with this decision. Additionally, the court ordered Parvin's lawyer to pay $9,745.25 in penalties for attorney fees and costs, finding the case lacked merit. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling demonstrates that courts take a firm stance against repeatedly filing similar lawsuits about the same employment dispute. Workers should understand that once a court has made a final decision on a workplace matter, filing essentially the same complaint again can result in the case being dismissed and financial penalties. This protects both employers and the court system from endless litigation while encouraging workers to resolve disputes thoroughly the first time through proper legal channels.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Similar Rulings

MATTHEW HAWN v. SULLIVAN COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION
Tenn. Ct. App.May 2026
Mixed Result
SIGNAL PUMP, LLC D/B/A SIGNAL POWER v. ARROW ELECTRONICS, INC.
Tenn. Ct. App.Apr 2026
Defendant Win
Cedar Nordbye v. University of Memphis
Tenn. Ct. App.Mar 2026
Defendant Win
HAMILTON COUNTY v. TAX YEAR 2010 DELINQUENT TAXPAYERS
Tenn. Ct. App.Mar 2026
Defendant Win
MONA WORD v. KNOX COUNTY
Tenn. Ct. App.Feb 2026

Plaintiff brought claims against Knox County and the County Clerk based on allegedly discriminatory employment practices. The trial court determined that Plaintiff committed serious discovery violations and imposed as a sanction the exclusion of certain evidence. With this evidence excluded, the trial court granted summary judgment to the Defendants. Plaintiff appeals, challenging the discovery sanction, the trial court's conclusion under the Tennessee Human Rights Act that the continuing violation doctrine did not apply, the trial court's conclusion that the Clerk was not individually liable, and the award of attorney's fees against the Plaintiff and her attorney. We affirm.

Mixed Result
Read Full OpinionMore Jackie LaDean Newman RulingsAll Rulings

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

Check Your RightsLearn the Basics

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.