Skip to main content

State of Tennessee v. Louis Grieco

TENNCRIMAPPMarch 10, 2017No. E2015-01110-CCA-R3-CD
DismissedLouis Grieco

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Status
Published
Procedural Posture
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Excerpt

Defendant, Louis Grieco, was arrested on August 24, 2013, without a warrant for driving under the influence (DUI). On the date of the arrest, the arresting officer summarized the facts underlying the offense in an affidavit of complaint, which he signed under oath before a notary public. Two days later, a general sessions judge found probable cause that the offense was committed based on the officer's affidavit of complaint. Over one year later, on October 6, 2014, Defendant waived his right to a preliminary hearing in General Sessions Court and agreed to have the case bound over to the Sullivan County Grand Jury. The grand jury indicted Defendant for DUI on January 21, 2015. Defendant filed a motion to dismiss the indictment as time barred, arguing that the affidavit of complaint was void because the officer did not make it on oath in the presence of an authorized official capable of making a probable cause determination. The trial court granted Defendant's motion to dismiss. The State appeals. Following our review, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

What This Ruling Means

This case involved Louis Grieco, who was arrested for driving under the influence (DUI) in August 2013. After his arrest, an officer wrote up the charges in a sworn statement, and a judge later found there was enough evidence to support the case. More than a year later, in October 2014, Grieco gave up certain legal rights related to his case. The court ultimately dismissed the case against Grieco. The exact reasons for dismissal aren't clear from the available information, but the criminal charges were dropped and no damages were awarded. **Why this matters for workers:** While this appears to be primarily a criminal DUI case rather than a workplace dispute, it's important for employees to understand that criminal charges can affect their employment. Many employers have policies about criminal convictions, and some jobs require clean driving records. Workers should know that: - Criminal charges (even if later dismissed) may need to be disclosed to employers depending on company policies - DUI convictions can impact jobs requiring driving - Some employers conduct background checks that may show arrests even if charges were dismissed - Workers have rights during criminal proceedings that shouldn't be waived without careful consideration

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.