Jade C. Nunnally v. Adam Nunnally

**What happened:** This was a divorce case between Jade and Adam Nunnally involving their daughter. After the trial court made its initial decisions, both parents appealed different parts of the ruling. Jade disagreed with the court naming Adam as the primary residential parent (meaning their daughter would live with him most of the time). Adam, on the other hand, objected to Jade receiving unsupervised visitation rights and argued that the child support calculations were wrong because the court incorrectly calculated both parents' monthly income. **What the court decided:** The appeals court upheld all of the original trial court's decisions. Adam remained the primary residential parent, Jade kept her unsupervised visitation rights, and the child support amount stayed the same. The appeals court found no errors in how the lower court handled any of these issues. **Why this matters for workers:** While this case doesn't directly involve workplace issues, it highlights how family court decisions about child support depend heavily on accurately calculating parents' income from their jobs. Workers going through divorce should ensure their employment income, benefits, and any side earnings are properly documented, as these figures directly impact child support obligations and can be challenged on appeal if calculated incorrectly.