Skip to main content

State of Tennessee v. Wynell Ford

TENNCRIMAPPMay 5, 2017No. W2016-01515-CCA-R3-CD
Defendant WinWynell Ford

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge Alan E. Glenn
Status
Published
Procedural Posture
Appeal from Madison County Circuit Court; appellate court affirmed sentencing

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Defendant Wynell Ford appealed the trial court's denial of his request for alternative sentencing after pleading guilty to convicted felon in possession of a firearm with a prior violent felony. The appellate court affirmed the sentencing.

Excerpt

The Defendant, Wynell Ford, pled guilty in the Madison County Circuit Court to convicted felon in possession of a firearm with a prior violent felony, a Class C felony, and was sentenced by the trial court as a multiple offender to ten years in the Department of Correction at thirty-five percent. On appeal, he challenges the trial court's denial of his request for alternative sentencing. Following our review, we affirm the sentencing determinations of the trial court.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** This case involves Wynell Ford, who was convicted of illegally possessing a firearm as a felon with a prior violent crime history. Ford pleaded guilty to this felony charge and was sentenced to 10 years in prison. He appealed to a higher court, asking for alternative sentencing options instead of prison time. **What the Court Decided** The Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals upheld the original sentence. The court rejected Ford's request for alternative sentencing and confirmed that the 10-year prison sentence was appropriate given his criminal history as a repeat offender. **Why This Matters for Workers** While this appears to be primarily a criminal case rather than an employment law matter, it highlights an important reality for workers: criminal convictions can have lasting employment consequences. Many employers conduct background checks and may refuse to hire individuals with felony convictions, particularly those involving weapons or violence. Workers should understand that criminal convictions can significantly impact their ability to find employment, even years after serving their sentence. This case demonstrates how the legal system handles repeat offenders, which can affect someone's future job prospects and career opportunities.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.