Tysheka Barnett v. B.F. Nashville, Inc. DBA Wendy's Of Nashville

Tenn. Ct. App.May 30, 2017No. M2016-00762-COA-R3-CV

Defendant WinB.F. Nashville, Inc. DBA Wendy's Of Nashville

Case Details

Judge(s): Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Status: Published
Procedural Posture: bench trial; appeal affirmed

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Trial court found plaintiff failed to prove sexual conduct was unwanted, thus could not establish harassment. Appellate court affirmed the trial court's credibility determinations and ruling.

Excerpt

Tysheka Barnett brought this action solely against her employer, B.F. Nashville, Inc., dba Wendy's of Nashville, alleging that Wendy's general manager, William Rogers, sexually harrassed her during her employment at a Wendy's restaurant. After a four-day bench trial, the court found that plaintiff had not met her burden of proof to show that the sexual conduct between her and Rogers was unwanted, and, therefore, she was unable to show harassment. On appeal, plaintiff primarily argues that the evidence preponderates against the trial court's determination that the sexual interaction in question was not unwelcomed by plaintiff. This ruling was driven and determined in large part by the trial court's evaluation of the credibility, including demeanor, of the various witnesses. Plaintiff appeals. We affirm.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened:** Tysheka Barnett, a Wendy's employee, sued her employer claiming that the restaurant's general manager, William Rogers, sexually harassed her while she worked there. She took the case to court seeking legal action against the company for allowing the harassment to occur. **What the Court Decided:** After a four-day trial, the court ruled against Barnett. The judge found that she could not prove the sexual conduct between her and Rogers was unwanted, which is a key requirement for proving sexual harassment. Without being able to show the conduct was unwelcome, the court determined she couldn't establish that harassment actually occurred. When Barnett appealed this decision to a higher court, the appeals court agreed with the original ruling and upheld the decision in favor of Wendy's. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This case highlights an important challenge in sexual harassment claims - workers must be able to prove that the sexual conduct was unwelcome or unwanted. Simply showing that sexual conduct happened isn't enough; employees need evidence demonstrating they didn't consent to or welcome the behavior. This makes it crucial for workers experiencing harassment to document incidents and clearly communicate that the behavior is unwanted, whether through reporting to supervisors, HR, or keeping written records of their objections.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

1st CircuitSep 1996

Settlement

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Mitsubishi Motor Manufacturing of America, Inc.

C.D. Ill.Jan 1998

Settlement

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Hearst Corporation, Doing Business as the Houston Chronicle Publishing Company

5th CircuitJan 1997

Defendant Win

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. AutoZone, Inc.

6th CircuitJun 2017

Defendant Win

EEOC v. Danka Industries, Inc.

E.D. Mo.Oct 1997

Mixed Result

Read Full Opinion More B.F. Nashville, Inc. DBA Wendy's Of Nashville Rulings All Rulings

Browse Related

Other hospitality employers

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

Check Your Rights Learn the Basics

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.