No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The North Carolina Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Appeals' decision that the workers' compensation plaintiff was entitled to a presumption of compensability for his ongoing medical treatment, and modified and affirmed the remand for the Industrial Commission to reconsider disability in light of plaintiff's tinnitus. The case was remanded for further proceedings.
Workers' Compensation whether a worker for whom the employer admitted compensability for physical injuries sustained on the job can later recover medical compensation for treatment of anxiety and depression whether the worker is entitled to continued payment of temporary total disability benefits.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Whether a unilateral amendment made pursuant to a change-of-terms provision violates the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and renders a contract illusory.
Whether the Industrial Commission's calculation of the plaintiff's average weekly wages pursuant to N.C.G.S. 97-2(5) and its determination concerning whether that calculation produces results that are fair and just to both parties involve an issue of law or an issue of fact.
Whether State employees are entitled to sovereign immunity against claims of negligence, gross negligence, and wrongful death brought against them in their individual capacities, and whether complaint stated cause of action.
Whether an individual may bring a claim under the North Carolina Constitution for a school board's deliberate indifference to continual student harassment.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.