Skip to main content

Julie Ann Norman v. Joshua Shane Norman

Tenn. Ct. App.November 28, 2017No. M2016-01990-COA-R3-CV

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge Richard H. Dinkins
Status
Published
Procedural Posture
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Excerpt

A Father appeals the trial court's decision to name the Mother as Primary Residential Parent of the parties' two children. Discerning no error, we affirm the decision of the trial court, award the Mother her attorneys' fee incurred on appeal, and remand the case for a determination of the amount.

What This Ruling Means

This case appears to be a family law matter rather than an employment law dispute, despite being categorized as such. The case involved Julie Ann Norman and Joshua Shane Norman in a custody battle over their two children. Joshua (the father) challenged a trial court's decision that named Julie (the mother) as the Primary Residential Parent of their children. **What the Court Decided:** The appeals court reviewed the trial court's custody decision and found no errors in the original ruling. They upheld the decision making Julie the primary residential parent. The court also ordered that Julie should receive payment for her attorney's fees from the appeal and sent the case back to determine the exact amount of those fees. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This case doesn't appear to establish any significant precedent for employment law or workplace rights. The categorization as an employment law case seems to be an error, as this is clearly a domestic relations/family law matter involving child custody. Workers looking for employment law guidance should focus on cases that actually involve workplace disputes, discrimination, wages, or other job-related legal issues rather than family court matters like this one.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.