Sevan (Bjorklund) Cappuccilli v. David A. Carcieri, M.D., d/b/a Medical Office of David A. Carcieri, M.D.
Case Details
- Status
- Published
- Procedural Posture
- appeal
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Excerpt
The plaintiff, Sevan (Bjorklund) Cappuccilli, appealed to the Supreme Court following a Superior Court judgment in favor of the defendants, David A. Carcieri, M.D., d/b/a Medical Office of David A. Carcieri, M.D., and Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island. The plaintiff's claim against the defendants derives from a vein injury she alleged occurred during an emergency cesarean section at Women & Infants. The jury ultimately returned a verdict for the defendants. The trial justice denied the plaintiff's subsequent motion for new trial, concluding that reasonable minds could differ. On appeal, the plaintiff asserted that the trial justice failed to weigh the credibility of the evidence in deciding the motion. The plaintiff also argued that the trial justice improperly excluded evidence from trial. The Supreme Court rejected the plaintiff's contention that the trial justice failed to make a credibility determination in deciding the motion for new trial. The Court also determined that the plaintiff's arguments regarding the excluded evidence were unpersuasive. Accordingly, the Court affirmed the Superior Court's judgment.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.