Skip to main content

State of Tennessee v. Shelton Stone Goss

TENNCRIMAPPDecember 22, 2017No. W2016-01227-CCA-R3-CD
Defendant WinShelton Stone Goss

Case Details

Judge(s)
Presiding Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Status
Published
Procedural Posture
Appeal - conviction affirmed on sufficiency of evidence claim

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Defendant's appeal of conviction for attempted second degree murder, aggravated burglary, and related firearms offenses was denied. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment after reviewing sufficiency of evidence claims.

Excerpt

Defendant, Shelton Stone Goss, was convicted by a Tipton County Jury of attempted second degree murder, aggravated burglary, five counts of burglary of a vehicle, two counts of theft under $500, one count of theft over $500, one count of theft over $1,000, employment of a firearm during the commission of a dangerous felony to wit: attempted second degree murder of Joshua Halleron, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a dangerous felony: to wit: aggravated burglary of the Halleron residence. He received an effective fourteen-year sentence to be served in confinement. On appeal, Defendant argues that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions. After a thorough review of the record, we affirm the judgments of the trial court.

What This Ruling Means

**Case Summary: State of Tennessee v. Shelton Stone Goss** This case involved Shelton Stone Goss, who was convicted of multiple serious crimes including attempted murder, burglary, theft, and illegal firearm use. Goss was found guilty by a jury in Tipton County and received criminal convictions on all charges. He then appealed his convictions to a higher court, challenging whether there was enough evidence to support the jury's verdict. The appellate court rejected Goss's appeal and upheld all of his criminal convictions. The court reviewed his claims that there wasn't sufficient evidence against him but determined the original trial court's decision was correct. All convictions for attempted second-degree murder, aggravated burglary, vehicle burglary, theft, and firearms offenses remained in place. **What This Means for Workers:** While this appears to be primarily a criminal case rather than a traditional employment law dispute, it serves as an important reminder that criminal convictions can have serious consequences for employment. Workers should understand that felony convictions, especially those involving violence or theft, can affect job opportunities, professional licenses, and workplace rights. Employers often conduct background checks and may legally refuse to hire or may terminate employees with certain criminal records.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.