Skip to main content

Jefferson County Schools v. Tennessee Risk Management Trust

Tenn. Ct. App.March 15, 2018No. E2017-01346-COA-R3-CV

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge D. Michael Swiney, C.J.
Status
Published
Procedural Posture
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Excerpt

In this appeal concerning insurance coverage, Jefferson County Schools ("Plaintiff") sued its insurers, Tennessee Risk Management Trust and Travelers Indemnity Company ("Defendants"), in the Chancery Court for Jefferson County ("the Trial Court"). Building 8 at Jefferson County High School collapsed during a rainstorm. The Tennessee State Fire Marshal's Office ordered Plaintiff to implement repairs to prevent a future collapse of both the damaged and undamaged portions. Plaintiff asserted that, pursuant to an "ordinance or law" provision in its insurance policy, Defendants were responsible for coverage for additional work in undamaged portions of Building 8 in order to comply with the Fire Marshal's directive. Defendants argue in response that the additional work was discretionary and went beyond what the insurance policy covered. After a hearing, the Trial Court entered judgment in favor of Defendants. Plaintiff appeals. We hold that the Fire Marshal's directive, issued under that office's authority, qualified as an "ordinance or law." Defendants were, therefore, required to cover the additional work. We reverse the judgment of the Trial Court and remand for determination and entry of a monetary judgment in favor of Plaintiff.

What This Ruling Means

This case involved Jefferson County Schools suing its insurance companies after Building 8 at Jefferson County High School collapsed during a rainstorm. The Tennessee State Fire Marshal ordered the school district to make repairs to prevent future collapses of both the damaged and undamaged parts of the building. The school district wanted its insurance companies - Tennessee Risk Management Trust and Travelers Indemnity Company - to cover the costs of these repairs. The court reached a mixed decision, meaning some parts of the case went in favor of the school district while others did not. The specific details of which claims succeeded or failed are not fully detailed in the available information, but the outcome suggests the insurance coverage dispute was partially resolved in the school's favor. For workers, this case highlights an important workplace safety issue. When building collapses occur at work sites like schools, employers have a legal obligation to make necessary repairs to protect employee and student safety. The case also shows that disputes over who pays for safety improvements can be complex, involving multiple insurance companies. Workers should know that employers cannot ignore official safety orders, even if there are disagreements about insurance coverage.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.