The court reversed the PELRB's dismissal of the Union's unfair labor practice complaint, finding that CCSNH was obligated to bargain over tutoring wages for adjunct faculty and to compensate an adjunct faculty member for lost tutoring income while participating in collective bargaining negotiations. The case was remanded for further proceedings.
What This Ruling Means
# Court Ruling Summary: Union Adjunct Faculty Tutoring Pay Case
## What Happened
The Service Employees' International Union filed a complaint against the Community College System of New Hampshire, claiming the college system refused to negotiate wages for adjunct faculty members who provided tutoring services. The union argued the college broke labor law by not bargaining over these wages and failing to compensate one adjunct faculty member for lost tutoring income during negotiations.
## What the Court Decided
A lower labor board initially dismissed the union's complaint, but the appeals court disagreed. The court found that the college system was legally required to negotiate tutoring wages with the union and should have compensated the adjunct faculty member for lost tutoring income. The case was sent back for further proceedings to determine the correct compensation amount.
## Why This Matters for Workers
This ruling protects workers' rights to have unions negotiate all parts of their pay, including supplemental income like tutoring fees. It establishes that employers cannot avoid bargaining discussions by claiming certain work falls outside the union agreement, and workers deserve compensation when pay disputes delay negotiations.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.