Whiting-Turner Contracting v. Comm'r of Labor & Ind.

# Whiting-Turner Contracting v. Commissioner of Labor & Industry ## What Happened Whiting-Turner Contracting Company was cited by Maryland's Occupational Safety and Health (MOSH) division for violating workplace safety rules. The agency claimed the company failed to use proper safety equipment—specifically gooser braces and spacer beams—during construction work, creating a dangerous condition for employees. ## What the Court Decided The Court of Special Appeals sided with Whiting-Turner and overturned the citation. The court ruled that MOSH did not provide sufficient evidence that the missing equipment constituted a recognized safety hazard. Without proof that these specific items were necessary safety precautions, the violation could not stand. ## Why This Matters for Workers This ruling sets a standard for workplace safety enforcement. While it favored the employer here, it also means that safety agencies must clearly demonstrate that equipment is truly necessary to protect workers before citing violations. Workers should understand that safety protections must be proven essential—but this also emphasizes the importance of workers reporting unsafe conditions so agencies can gather proper evidence of real hazards.