Skip to main content

Anne Shacklett v. Anthony A. Rose

Tenn. Ct. App.May 2, 2018No. M2017-01650-COA-R3-CV

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge Arnold B. Goldin
Status
Published
Procedural Posture
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Excerpt

This is a slip-and-fall case. An employee of a catering company fell, injuring herself when leaving a private residence after dark as she attempted to traverse an outside staircase. The employee brought suit against the homeowners, and the homeowners filed a motion for summary judgment. The trial court granted the homeowners' motion, concluding that the homeowners did not owe the employee a duty of care. Our review of the record has revealed that material, disputed facts remain which render this case inappropriate for summary judgment. Accordingly, we reverse and remand.

What This Ruling Means

**What happened:** Anne Shacklett worked for a catering company and was injured when she fell down an outside staircase while leaving a private home after dark following a catering event. She sued the homeowners, Anthony A. Rose and others, claiming they were responsible for her injuries. The homeowners asked the trial court to dismiss the case, arguing they had no legal responsibility to keep their property safe for the catering worker. **What the court decided:** The trial court initially sided with the homeowners and dismissed the case. However, the appeals court disagreed and sent the case back to the lower court for further proceedings. The appeals court found there were still important factual questions that needed to be resolved before determining whether the homeowners had a duty to maintain safe conditions for visiting workers. **Why this matters for workers:** This ruling is significant because it keeps alive the possibility that property owners may have legal obligations to ensure safe conditions for workers who come onto their property as part of their jobs. The decision suggests that workers injured on someone else's property while performing work duties may still have legal options, even when the property owner claims no responsibility.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.