Skip to main content

State of Tennessee v. Robert Burnette

TENNCRIMAPPSeptember 6, 2018No. W2017-02263-CCA-R3-CD
Defendant WinRobert Burnette

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Status
Published
Procedural Posture
Appeal from trial court conviction; appellate affirmance

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the trial court's conviction and life sentence without parole for attempted first degree premeditated murder, firearm use during a dangerous felony, and felon in possession of a weapon. The appellate court rejected the defendant's claims regarding witness competency and sufficiency of evidence.

Excerpt

A Shelby County jury convicted the Defendant, Robert Burnette, of attempted first degree premeditated murder, employment of a firearm during the commission of a dangerous felony, and being a felon in possession of a weapon. The trial court sentenced the Defendant to life without the possibility of parole. On appeal, the Defendant claims that the trial court erred when it allowed an undisclosed and incompetent witness to testify, and that the evidence is insufficient to sustain his conviction for attempted first degree premeditated murder. After a thorough review of the record and applicable law, we affirm the trial court's judgments.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened:** This case involved Robert Burnette, who was convicted by a Shelby County jury of attempted first-degree murder, using a firearm during a dangerous crime, and illegally possessing a weapon as a felon. Burnette was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. He appealed his conviction, arguing that the trial court made errors regarding witness testimony and that there wasn't enough evidence to convict him. **What the Court Decided:** The Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals upheld Burnette's conviction and life sentence. The appeals court rejected his arguments about problems with witness testimony and insufficient evidence, affirming that the original trial was conducted properly and the conviction was valid. **Why This Matters for Workers:** While this appears to be a criminal case rather than a typical employment law matter, it's important to note that this case doesn't establish any new workplace rights or protections for employees. Workers should be aware that criminal convictions, especially violent felonies, can severely impact employment opportunities and workplace safety policies. This case reinforces that serious criminal behavior has lasting consequences that extend beyond the courtroom into professional life.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.