Skip to main content

Shawn T. Slaughter v. Grover T. Mills

Tenn. Ct. App.December 19, 2018No. E2017-02288-COA-R3-CV
SettlementGrover T. Mills

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Status
Published
Procedural Posture
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Excerpt

This matter involves Hamilton County's attempt to recover funds it paid, through its on-the- job injury program, on behalf of one of its employees, Shawn T. Slaughter. Mr. Slaughter was injured while riding in a County vehicle when that vehicle collided with another vehicle he filed suit against the drivers and the County. Prior to trial, Mr. Slaughter settled with one of the defendant drivers. After trial, having been found not atfault by the jury, the County attempted to assert a lien against settlement. The trial court held that the County does not have a contractual or statutory basis for a lien against Mr. Slaughter's settlement. It further held that, because Mr. Slaughter was not made whole by his settlement, the County is not entitled to subrogation. The County filed a motion for reconsideration and requested a ruling on its asserted constitutional basis for recovery. The court denied the County's motion. The County appeals. We affirm

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened:** Shawn Slaughter, a Hamilton County employee, was injured in a car accident while riding in a county vehicle during work. The county's workers' compensation program paid for his medical expenses and other injury-related costs. Slaughter then sued the other drivers involved in the crash. He settled with one driver before going to trial, and a jury found the county was not at fault for the accident. After the trial, Hamilton County tried to recover the money it had paid for Slaughter's injuries by placing a lien against his settlement. **What the Court Decided:** The case ended in a settlement, meaning the parties reached an agreement outside of court rather than having a judge make a final ruling. No specific damage amounts were reported. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This case highlights an important issue workers should understand: when you're injured on the job and receive workers' compensation benefits, your employer may have the right to recover some of that money if you later receive a settlement from someone else who caused your injury. This is called subrogation, and it can affect how much money you ultimately keep from any lawsuit settlements related to your workplace injury.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.