No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Court denied the writ of mandamus because the amount of back pay recoverable had not been established with certainty, requiring such certainty as a prerequisite for mandamus relief.
Because the amount of back pay recoverable has not been established with certainty, Stultz is not entitled to the requested writ of mandamus.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.