State of Tennessee v. Christopher Swift
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Judge D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.
- Status
- Published
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal appeal of conviction; appellate court affirmed trial court judgment
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Outcome
Christopher Swift was convicted of first degree premeditated murder, attempted first degree murder, and employment of a firearm during a dangerous felony. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's conviction and sentence of life plus twenty-six years, rejecting all nine grounds of appeal.
Excerpt
The Defendant, Christopher Swift, was convicted by a jury of first degree premeditated murder attempted first degree murder, a Class A felony and employment of a firearm during the commission of a dangerous felony a Class C felony. See Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 39-12-101, -13-202, -17-1324. The trial court later imposed a total effective sentence of life plus twenty-six years. On appeal, the Defendant contends that (1) the evidence was insufficient to sustain the Defendant's conviction for first degree premeditated murder (2) the trial court abused its discretion in denying the Defendant's motion to disqualify one of the prosecutors (3) African-Americans were improperly excluded from the jury venire (4) the State "intentionally mislead [the] jury" during the examination of one of its witnesses (5) the trial court erred by allowing the admission of hearsay (6) the trial court erred by allowing the jury to review transcripts of recorded jail phone calls as those recordings were played (7) the State improperly displayed photographic exhibits during its closing argument (8) the State withheld evidence and (9) a new trial is warranted due to cumulative error. Following our review, we affirm the judgments of the trial court.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Defendant, Montrell Reid, appeals from his guilty-pleaded convictions for harassment and stalking, both Class A misdemeanors. Under the plea agreement, Defendant agreed to serve eleven months and twenty-nine days for each count, with the sentences to be served consecutively and the manner of service to be determined by the trial court. At sentencing, the trial court denied Defendant's request for probation and ordered that he serve his sentence in confinement. On appeal, Defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his request for probation. Following our review, we affirm the trial court's judgments as to the denial of probation, but we remand for a determination of the percentage of service pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-35-302(d).
The Madison County Grand Jury indicted Defendant, Andre Davis, Jr., for one count each of harassment and aggravated stalking. A jury found Defendant guilty as charged, and the trial court imposed an effective two-year sentence. Defendant appeals and argues that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions. After a careful review of the record and the briefs of the parties, we affirm the judgments of the trial court.
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.