Skip to main content

State of Tennessee v. Christopher Calvera

TENNCRIMAPPApril 25, 2019No. E2018-00982-CCA-R3-CD
Defendant WinChristopher Calvera

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.
Status
Published
Procedural Posture
Appeal affirmed; jury trial conviction upheld

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Defendant Calvera was convicted of retaliation for past action (Class E felony) and acquitted of assault charges. Sentenced to four years; conviction affirmed on appeal despite claims of insufficient evidence and prosecutorial misconduct.

Excerpt

The Defendant, Christopher Calvera, was indicted for retaliation for past action, a Class E felony and assault, a Class A misdemeanor. See Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 39-13-101, -16-510. Following a jury trial, the Defendant was convicted of the retaliation for past action charge and acquitted of the assault charge. The trial court later imposed a four-year sentence for the retaliation conviction. On appeal, the Defendant contends that (1) the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction and (2) the trial court committed plain error in denying his motion for a mistrial alleging that the State committed prosecutorial misconduct during its closing argument. Following our review, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Christopher Calvera, who appears to have been an employer, was charged with retaliating against someone for a past action they had taken, as well as assault. The case went to trial, where a jury found him guilty of the retaliation charge but not guilty of assault. He was sentenced to four years in prison and appealed the decision, claiming there wasn't enough evidence to convict him and that prosecutors acted improperly. **What the Court Decided** The appeals court upheld Calvera's conviction and four-year sentence. Despite his arguments that the evidence was insufficient and that there was prosecutorial misconduct, the court determined that the original trial was fair and the guilty verdict was supported by the evidence presented. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case shows that retaliation against workers can be treated as a serious criminal offense, not just a workplace issue. When employers or supervisors illegally retaliate against employees for protected activities (like filing complaints or reporting violations), they can face felony charges and significant prison time. This demonstrates that the legal system takes workplace retaliation seriously and provides strong protections for workers who exercise their rights.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.