Skip to main content

Adam Corbit, et ux v. Andrey Samolovov

Wash. Ct. App.June 25, 2019No. 36135-7
Plaintiff WinAndrey Samolovov$2,754.77 awarded

Case Details

Status
Unpublished
Procedural Posture
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court affirmed the trial court's default judgment in favor of the Corbits, quieting title and extinguishing the defendants' tax lien on the property. The Corbits recovered attorney fees and costs.

What This Ruling Means

Based on the limited information provided, this case involved Adam Corbit and his spouse in an employment law dispute against Andrey Samolovov, who appears to have been Corbit's employer. The case was filed in Washington State Court of Appeals in June 2019. Unfortunately, the available case details are insufficient to determine what specific employment issue was at the center of this dispute. The excerpt doesn't provide enough information about the nature of the workplace conflict, what legal claims were made, or how the court ultimately ruled on the matter. Without knowing the court's decision or the specific employment law violations alleged, it's impossible to draw meaningful conclusions about what this case means for workers. The lack of reported damages also makes it unclear whether this was a significant employment law precedent or a more routine workplace dispute. For workers seeking to understand their employment rights, this case highlights the importance of having access to complete court records and legal documentation when trying to learn from employment law decisions. Workers facing workplace issues should consult with employment attorneys who can access full case records and provide guidance based on complete legal information.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.