Skip to main content

Demas v. State Med. Bd. of Ohio

Ohio Ct. App.July 18, 2019No. 18AP-978

Case Details

Judge(s)
Nelson
Status
Published
Procedural Posture
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Excerpt

The common pleas court did not err in upholding the state medical board's permanent revocation of a doctor's certificate to practice medicine after the board found that the doctor had practiced in the name of others while under suspension for having been convicted of seven felony counts of forgery. The doctor had conceded the misconduct and did not preserve for administrative appeal any argument that he had not engaged in the unauthorized practice of medicine. The court committed no error in finding that the state medical board's order was supported by reliable, probative, and substantial evidence, was in accordance with law, and imposed a sanction authorized by law. And the common pleas court also did not err in finding no constitutional imperative that the board be reconstituted before considering sanctions on remand from an earlier court determination, and that the board on remand had conducted its proceedings in keeping with law and with the court's earlier directives. Assignments of error overruled judgment affirmed.

What This Ruling Means

**What happened:** Dr. Demas was a physician whose medical license was suspended after he was convicted of seven felony forgery charges. While his license was suspended, he continued practicing medicine by using other doctors' names and credentials. The State Medical Board of Ohio discovered this unauthorized practice and permanently revoked his medical license. Dr. Demas challenged this decision in court, arguing the revocation was too harsh. **What the court decided:** The court upheld the medical board's decision to permanently revoke Dr. Demas's license. The court found that the medical board acted properly when it revoked his license for practicing medicine without authorization while already under suspension. Dr. Demas had admitted to the misconduct and failed to present valid legal arguments during his administrative appeal process. **Why this matters for workers:** This case shows that professional licensing boards have strong authority to discipline licensed workers who violate regulations. When professionals commit serious misconduct—especially criminal behavior followed by unauthorized practice—they risk losing their licenses permanently. Workers in licensed professions should understand that regulatory boards take violations seriously and that criminal convictions can have lasting consequences for their careers, even beyond any criminal penalties they face.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.