Skip to main content

Anderson County v. Preston

SCAugust 7, 2019No. Appellate Case 2017-001898; Opinion 27912Cited 2 times
RemandedPreston

Case Details

Judge(s)
Beatty
Status
Published
Procedural Posture
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Excerpt

In this appeal arising out of Anderson County Council's approval of a severance agreement, the Court vacates the decision of the Court of Appeals finds the Severance Agreement invalid due to the County's lack of a quorum and remands to the circuit court to determine the exact amount that Preston must refund the County.

What This Ruling Means

# Anderson County v. Preston Case Summary **What Happened** Preston received a severance agreement from Anderson County Council after leaving employment. A severance agreement is a contract that specifies payments and benefits a worker receives when leaving a job. However, questions arose about whether the county properly approved this agreement. **What the Court Decided** The court found that Anderson County Council did not have enough members present when they voted to approve Preston's severance deal. This is called a "quorum"—the minimum number of people needed to make official decisions. Because the approval was invalid, the court threw out the agreement and sent the case back to a lower court. That court must now determine exactly how much money Preston must return to the county. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case shows that severance agreements must be approved properly by employers through correct legal procedures. Even if both sides seemed to agree, the deal can be cancelled if the approval process violated rules. Workers should understand that severance agreements need proper authorization to be enforceable, protecting both employers and employees.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.