Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Sadler
- Status
- Published
- Procedural Posture
- trial verdict
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Excerpt
Pursuant to Columbus Div. of Income Tax v. Capital Data Sys., 186 Ohio App.3d 775, 2010-Ohio-1026, ¶ 9 (10th Dist.), a judgment debtor who ultimately received a hearing was not prejudiced by allegedly not receiving notice of a nonwage order of garnishment under R.C. 2716.13(C) and (D), and, therefore, the trial court erred in ordering the disputed funds released to the judgment debtor instead of the judgment creditor. Judgment reversed cause remanded.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.