Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Sadler
- Status
- Published
- Procedural Posture
- trial verdict
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Excerpt
Trial court did not abuse its discretion in establishing a de facto date of marriage termination prior to the date of the final hearing where the evidence supported the trial court's finding there had been a clear and bilateral breakdown of the marriage. The evidence supports the trial court's finding that a sale of the marital residence was required in order to facilitate an equitable property division. However, the trial court abused its discretion by failing to assign value to the marital residence as of the de facto date of marriage termination and when it used appellant's gross income in calculating his spousal support obligation. Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part, and cause remanded for a proper valuation of the marital residence and redetermination of spousal support.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.