S.L.E. Real Estate, L.L.C. v. Scott

Ohio Ct. App.December 27, 2019No. 28466

Mixed ResultScott$821.21 awarded

Case Details

Judge(s): Hall
Status: Published
Procedural Posture: appellate review modifying trial court judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Appellate court modified the trial court's judgment in favor of the appellee (Scott), reducing damages from $2,018.57 to $821.21 due to erroneous award of unpaid rent that was actually paid via cancelled checks.

Excerpt

The trial court erred in awarding the appellee $1,200 for one month of unpaid rent. The appellants' payment obligation to the appellee under a land contract terminated on June 30, 2018, when the parties signed a written land contract cancellation and release of their land contract. Thereafter, the appellants remained in the appellee's residence for two full months as month-to-month tenants. The record contains two $1,200 cancelled checks from the appellants corresponding to those two months. Therefore, the record does not support the trial court's determination that the appellants owed the appellee another $1,200. The record also contains a minor arithmetic error in the amount of the trial court's judgment, which we correct. Judgment against the appellants and in favor of the appellee modified from $2,018.57 plus interest and costs to $821.21 plus interest and costs. As so modified, the trial court's judgment is affirmed.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened:** This case involved a property dispute between S.L.E. Real Estate and Scott over unpaid rent and a cancelled land contract. Scott had been living in a property owned by S.L.E. Real Estate under a land contract (a type of property purchase agreement). In June 2018, both parties signed paperwork canceling this contract. After the cancellation, Scott continued living in the property as a month-to-month tenant for two additional months and made rent payments during this time. **What the Court Decided:** The appellate court reduced the money Scott owed from $2,018.57 to $821.21. The lower trial court had wrongly ordered Scott to pay $1,200 for one month of unpaid rent. However, Scott had actually paid this rent, as proven by cancelled checks showing payments for both months he lived there as a tenant. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This case shows the importance of keeping detailed payment records, especially when housing arrangements change. Scott's cancelled checks served as crucial evidence that saved him $1,200. Workers should always keep receipts, cancelled checks, or bank statements as proof of payments made to landlords or employers, particularly during transitions in living or working arrangements.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Similar Rulings

Ohio Ct. App.Apr 2026

Remanded

Lashaway v. Lashaway

Ohio Ct. App.Mar 2026

Dismissed

State v. Ayers

Ohio Ct. App.Mar 2026

Plaintiff Win

Youngstown v. Carrier Servs. Group, Inc.

Ohio Ct. App.Mar 2026

Settlement

Read Full Opinion More Scott Rulings All Rulings

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

Check Your Rights Learn the Basics

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.