Crew v. Advics Mfg. Ohio, Inc.
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Hendrickson
- Status
- Published
- Procedural Posture
- summary judgment
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Excerpt
The trial court did not err in determining that the client of a staffing agency was the plaintiff-appellant's employer for purposes of workers' compensation immunity as the client had the right to control the manner and means in which appellant performed his day-to-day tasks. Moreover, the trial court properly granted summary judgment to the client-employer because it complied with the relevant workers' compensation statues, thereby entitling it to immunity under R.C. 4123.74.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.