Skip to main content

State of Tennessee v. Ricky Breeden

TENNCRIMAPPSeptember 21, 2020No. E2019-00983-CCA-R3-CD
Mixed ResultRicky Breeden

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge Robert H. Montgomery, Jr.
Status
Published
Procedural Posture
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Excerpt

The Defendant, Ricky Dale Breeden, was convicted by a Union County Criminal Court jury of three counts of rape of a child, a Class A felony, and two counts of aggravated sexual battery, a Class B felony. See T.C.A. §§ 39-13-522 (2018) (subsequently amended) (rape of a child), 39-13-504 (2018) (aggravated sexual battery). He was sentenced to an effective ninety-five years for the convictions. On appeal, he contends that (1) the evidence is insufficient to support his rape of a child convictions, (2) the State failed to make a proper election of offenses, (3) the trial court erred in denying his motion for expert funds, (4) the court erred by ordering consecutive service. Although we affirm the Defendant's rape of a child convictions, we reverse the Defendant's convictions for aggravated sexual battery and remand the case for a new trial.

What This Ruling Means

This case involves Ricky Dale Breeden, who was convicted of serious criminal charges including rape of a child and aggravated sexual battery. He was sentenced to 95 years in prison by a Union County Criminal Court jury and appealed his conviction, arguing that there wasn't enough evidence to support the charges against him. **What the Court Decided:** The appeals court appears to have issued a mixed ruling on Breeden's appeal, though the specific details of their decision regarding the sufficiency of evidence are not fully detailed in the available excerpt. **Why This Matters for Workers:** While this case primarily involves criminal law rather than traditional employment law, it highlights an important workplace safety issue. Employers have a legal duty to protect their workers and customers from individuals who pose a danger. This case demonstrates the serious legal consequences that can result from criminal behavior in workplace settings. Workers should be aware that they have the right to report suspicious or inappropriate behavior to management and law enforcement. Employers must take such reports seriously and conduct proper background checks to maintain safe work environments for all employees and customers.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.