Skip to main content

Eric Wayne Barton v. Mechelle Schlomer Barton

Tenn. Ct. App.November 10, 2020No. E2019-01336-COA-R3-CV

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge Arnold B. Goldin
Status
Published
Procedural Posture
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Excerpt

In this appeal arising out of the parties' divorce, the Husband raises issues pertaining to the court's classification, valuation, and division of the marital estate, as well as the court's award of attorney's fees to Wife. Upon our review, we vacate those parts of the judgment that awarded a lien on real property belonging to LLCs in which Husband had 100 percent ownership interest as well as an award to Wife of an interest in a contingent contractual claim against the United States Government that is an asset of an LLC in which Husband had 100 percent ownership interest. Additionally, in light of this Court's determination that the contractual claim is an asset of an LLC owned 100 percent by Husband, we conclude that the record requires the court to reconsider the valuation of the parties' business interests in the LLC that has the contractual claim. Although the trial court must necessarily consider the impact that the contractual claim has on the parties' net marital business interests, we note that the court's current calculations, which are divorced from a proper consideration of the impact of the contractual claim, overvalued the net marital business interests based upon its own findings. In light of the fact that the case is being remanded for further consideration of the valuation of the parties' net marital business interests, we also vacate the trial court's equitable division of the estate and its award of attorney's fees to Wife and remand for further consideration. We also decline to award Wife her attorney's fees on appeal. The balance of the judgment is affirmed.

What This Ruling Means

**What happened:** This case involved a divorcing couple where employment and business ownership issues became part of their divorce proceedings. Eric Wayne Barton had 100% ownership in several limited liability companies (LLCs) and had a potential contract claim against the U.S. Government. During the divorce, the court had to decide how to divide these business assets and determine what belonged to each spouse. **What the court decided:** The appeals court overturned parts of the lower court's decision. Specifically, it removed liens (legal claims) that had been placed on real property owned by the husband's LLCs. The court also took away an award that would have given the wife a share in the husband's potential government contract claim. The case was sent back to the lower court for further review. **Why this matters for workers:** This ruling shows that business owners' personal assets may receive some protection during divorce proceedings, especially when they have complete ownership of their companies. For employees who own businesses or have ownership interests in companies, this case suggests that clear business ownership structures might help protect certain assets during personal legal disputes. However, the specifics of each situation matter greatly in these complex cases.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.