Skip to main content

Barbara Lundell v. Lois Hubbs

Tenn. Ct. App.November 23, 2020No. E2019-02168-COA-R3-CV
Defendant WinLois Hubbs

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge Thomas R. Frierson, II
Status
Published
Procedural Posture
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Excerpt

In this negligence action arising from the plaintiff's injuries sustained while attempting to traverse the aisle of a moving school bus, the trial court granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment following a determination that (1) the plaintiff had not demonstrated that the defendants had breached any duty of care to the plaintiff and (2) alternatively, any reasonable fact-finder could only conclude that the plaintiff was at least fifty percent (50%) at fault for her injuries. In so finding, the trial court declined to consider the plaintiff's captioned "Declaration" in part because it failed to meet the affidavit requirements of Tennessee Rule of Civil Procedure 56.06. In filing her "Declaration" in support of her opposition to summary judgment, the plaintiff sought to amend her prior deposition testimony concerning the location of her fall. The trial court additionally denied the plaintiff's "Motion to Deem Requests for Admission Admitted" after the plaintiff averred that the defendants had failed to respond to the plaintiff's initial requests for admission for over five-hundred days. The plaintiff has appealed. Having determined that genuine issues of material fact exist regarding the defendants' breach of duty of care and comparative fault, we reverse the trial court's granting of summary judgment in favor of the defendants and the trial court's finding that the plaintiff's "Declaration" should not be considered. We affirm the trial court's denial of the plaintiff's "Motion to Deem Requests for Admissions Admitted."

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened:** Barbara Lundell was injured while trying to walk down the aisle of a moving school bus. She sued her employer, Lois Hubbs, claiming the employer was negligent and responsible for her injuries. Lundell argued that her employer failed to provide a safe workplace and didn't meet their duty of care toward employees. **What the Court Decided:** The court ruled in favor of the employer and dismissed Lundell's case entirely. The judge found two key problems with Lundell's lawsuit: First, the employer had not actually failed in any legal duty to keep Lundell safe. Second, even if there had been some employer fault, Lundell herself was at least 50% responsible for her own injuries by choosing to walk down the aisle of a moving bus. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This case shows that workers cannot automatically blame their employers for all workplace injuries. Even when injured on the job, employees may be held responsible if their own unsafe actions significantly contributed to the accident. Workers should follow basic safety practices, as courts will consider whether the employee's behavior was reasonable when determining fault in injury cases.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.