Ames v. Rootstown Twp. Bd. of Trustees
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Rice
- Status
- Published
- Procedural Posture
- trial verdict
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Excerpt
CIVIL - Open Meetings Act R.C. 121.22 trial court's injunction issued on remand from this court was insufficient to address both ways the Board violated the OMA the determination of whether the violations were technical, substantial, egregious, or made in bad faith was properly left to the discretion of the trial court and the trial court did not err in determining they were not technical, and not substantial, egregious, or made in bad faith a trial court does not err in issuing a single injunction when the violations were tehnical in nature and do not involve an intent to conceal the overall purpose of the meeting or create distinct formal actions when multiple technical violations are of the same nature, the remedy is one injunction and one civil forfeiture the trial court did not abuse its discretion in reducing attorney's fees when the errors were technical, not substantial, egregious, or made in bad faith and the Board's belief was reasonable based on the ordinary application of statutory and case law as it existed at the time of the violation, and the Board reasonably believed that the conduct would serve the public policy of the OMA affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.