Ex Parte Adam Matthew Hammond
Tex. App.—2nd Dist.June 10, 2021No. 02-21-00020-CR
Defendant WinEx Parte Adam Matthew Hammond
Case Details
- Status
- Published
- Procedural Posture
- appeal
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Outcome
The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, finding no error.
What This Ruling Means
Based on the information provided, this case summary cannot be completed as requested because there appears to be an error in the case classification.
**What happened:** This case, Ex Parte Adam Matthew Hammond, was a criminal appeal heard by the Texas Court of Appeals in 2021, not an employment law dispute. The "Ex Parte" designation indicates this was a criminal matter, where Hammond was likely appealing a criminal conviction or sentence.
**What the court decided:** The Texas Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment, meaning they upheld whatever decision the lower court had made in Hammond's criminal case.
**Why this matters for workers:** This case does not actually relate to employment law or workplace rights. It appears to have been misclassified in the database as an employment case when it was actually a criminal appeal. Therefore, this ruling has no direct impact on workers' rights, workplace protections, or employment-related legal precedents.
For accurate information about employment law cases and how they affect workers' rights, it's important to review cases that actually involve workplace disputes, discrimination claims, wage and hour violations, or other genuine employment matters.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
The University of Texas at Arlington v. Julie Shaw
Tex. App.—2nd Dist.May 2026
The Bridge Strategy & Technology Consulting, LLC v. Josh Adams
Tex. App.—2nd Dist.Apr 2026
In Re American Federation of Government Employees and AFGE Local 1006 v. the State of Texas
Tex. App.—2nd Dist.Dec 2024
Maria Socorro Estrada, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Cesar Estrada Rangel, and as Next of Friend to C.E., Jr., Y.E. and N.E., Minors Juliana Meza on Behalf of the Estate of Leo Marin and as Next Friend to E.I.M., a Minor Amanda M. Estrada as Next Friend to J.O.H.P., a Minor And Damian Michael Estrada v. 12291 CBW, LLC D/B/A Temptations Cabaret, Inc. RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. And RCI Holdings, Inc.
Tex. App.—2nd Dist.Oct 2021
Maria Socorro Estrada, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Cesar Estrada Rangel, and as Next of Friend to C.E., Jr., Y.E. and N.E., Minors Juliana Meza on Behalf of the Estate of Leo Marin and as Next Friend to E.I.M., a Minor Amanda M. Estrada as Next Friend to J.O.H.P., a Minor And Damian Michael Estrada v. 12291 CBW, LLC D/B/A Temptations Cabaret, Inc. RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. And RCI Holdings, Inc.
Tex. App.—2nd Dist.Sep 2021
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.